Unsafe at Any Level: Very Low Blood Alcohol Content Associated With Causing Car Crashes

Posted Jan 21, 2014

Close

E-mail Article

Complete form to e-mail article…

Required fields are denoted by an asterisk (*) adjacent to the label.

Separate multiple recipients with a comma

Close

Sign-Up For Newsletters

Complete this form to sign-up for newsletters…

Required fields are denoted by an asterisk (*) adjacent to the label.

 

Even “minimally buzzed” drivers are more often to blame for fatal car crashes than the sober drivers they collide with, reports a University of California, San Diego study of accidents in the United States.

Led by UC San Diego sociologist David Phillips and published in the British Medical Journal group’s Injury Prevention, the study examined 570,731 fatal collisions, from 1994 to 2011.

Study method

The researchers used the official U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) database for the study, because it is nationally comprehensive and because it reports on blood alcohol content (BAC) in increments of 0.01 percent. They focus particularly on “buzzed drivers,” with BAC of 0.01 to 0.07 percent, and, within this group, the “minimally buzzed” (or BAC 0.01 percent).

Findings

Phillips and his co-authors found that drivers with BAC 0.01 percent—well below the U.S. legal limit of 0.08—are 46 percent more likely to be officially and solely blamed by accident investigators than are the sober drivers they collide with.

The authors also found no “threshold effect”—“no sudden transition from blameless to blamed” at the legal limit for drunk driving. Instead, blame increases steadily and smoothly from BAC 0.01 to 0.24 percent.

Criminal considerations

Despite this evidence, “buzzed” drivers are often not punished more severely than their sober counterparts. In practice, Phillips said, police, judges and the public at large treat BAC 0.08 percent as “a sharp, definitive, meaningful boundary,” and do not impose severe penalties on those below the legal limit. That needs to change, Phillips said. “The law should reflect what official accident investigators are seeing.”

The researchers measured blame by looking at more than 50 driver factors coded in the FARS database, including such “unambiguous” factors as driving through a red light or driving on the wrong side of the road.

Many of the study’s analyses take advantage of what the authors call “a natural experiment”: 2-vehicle collisions between a sober and a drinking driver. “Because the two drivers collide in exactly the same circumstances and at exactly the same time,” they write, “this natural experiment automatically standardizes many potentially confounding variables,” including weather and roadway conditions.

No safe level

The findings are unequivocal, Phillips said. “We find no safe combination of drinking and driving—no point at which it is harmless to consume alcohol and get behind the wheel of a car,” Phillips said. “Our data support both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s campaign that ‘Buzzed driving is drunk driving’ and the recommendation made by the National Transportation Safety Board, to reduce the legal limit to BAC 0.05 percent. In fact, our data provide support for yet greater reductions in the legal BAC.”

The current study follows up on a paper Phillips published in 2011 showing that buzzed driving is associated with greater accident severity.

Source: University of California San Diego, http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/unsafe_at_any_level_very_low_blood_alcohol_content_associated_with_causing

Even “minimally buzzed” drivers are more often to blame for fatal car crashes than the sober drivers they collide with, reports a University of California, San Diego study of accidents in the United States.

Led by UC San Diego sociologist David Phillips and published in the British Medical Journal group’s Injury Prevention, the study examined 570,731 fatal collisions, from 1994 to 2011.

Study method

The researchers used the official U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) database for the study, because it is nationally comprehensive and because it reports on blood alcohol content (BAC) in increments of 0.01 percent. They focus particularly on “buzzed drivers,” with BAC of 0.01 to 0.07 percent, and, within this group, the “minimally buzzed” (or BAC 0.01 percent).

Findings

Phillips and his co-authors found that drivers with BAC 0.01 percent—well below the U.S. legal limit of 0.08—are 46 percent more likely to be officially and solely blamed by accident investigators than are the sober drivers they collide with.

The authors also found no “threshold effect”—“no sudden transition from blameless to blamed” at the legal limit for drunk driving. Instead, blame increases steadily and smoothly from BAC 0.01 to 0.24 percent.

Criminal considerations

Despite this evidence, “buzzed” drivers are often not punished more severely than their sober counterparts. In practice, Phillips said, police, judges and the public at large treat BAC 0.08 percent as “a sharp, definitive, meaningful boundary,” and do not impose severe penalties on those below the legal limit. That needs to change, Phillips said. “The law should reflect what official accident investigators are seeing.”

The researchers measured blame by looking at more than 50 driver factors coded in the FARS database, including such “unambiguous” factors as driving through a red light or driving on the wrong side of the road.

Many of the study’s analyses take advantage of what the authors call “a natural experiment”: 2-vehicle collisions between a sober and a drinking driver. “Because the two drivers collide in exactly the same circumstances and at exactly the same time,” they write, “this natural experiment automatically standardizes many potentially confounding variables,” including weather and roadway conditions.

No safe level

The findings are unequivocal, Phillips said. “We find no safe combination of drinking and driving—no point at which it is harmless to consume alcohol and get behind the wheel of a car,” Phillips said. “Our data support both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s campaign that ‘Buzzed driving is drunk driving’ and the recommendation made by the National Transportation Safety Board, to reduce the legal limit to BAC 0.05 percent. In fact, our data provide support for yet greater reductions in the legal BAC.”

The current study follows up on a paper Phillips published in 2011 showing that buzzed driving is associated with greater accident severity.

Source: University of California San Diego, http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/unsafe_at_any_level_very_low_blood_alcohol_content_associated_with_causing

Even “minimally buzzed” drivers are more often to blame for fatal car crashes than the sober drivers they collide with, reports a University of California, San Diego study of accidents in the United States.

Led by UC San Diego sociologist David Phillips and published in the British Medical Journal group’s Injury Prevention, the study examined 570,731 fatal collisions, from 1994 to 2011.

Study method

The researchers used the official U.S. Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) database for the study, because it is nationally comprehensive and because it reports on blood alcohol content (BAC) in increments of 0.01 percent. They focus particularly on “buzzed drivers,” with BAC of 0.01 to 0.07 percent, and, within this group, the “minimally buzzed” (or BAC 0.01 percent).

Findings

Phillips and his co-authors found that drivers with BAC 0.01 percent—well below the U.S. legal limit of 0.08—are 46 percent more likely to be officially and solely blamed by accident investigators than are the sober drivers they collide with.

The authors also found no “threshold effect”—“no sudden transition from blameless to blamed” at the legal limit for drunk driving. Instead, blame increases steadily and smoothly from BAC 0.01 to 0.24 percent.

Criminal considerations

Despite this evidence, “buzzed” drivers are often not punished more severely than their sober counterparts. In practice, Phillips said, police, judges and the public at large treat BAC 0.08 percent as “a sharp, definitive, meaningful boundary,” and do not impose severe penalties on those below the legal limit. That needs to change, Phillips said. “The law should reflect what official accident investigators are seeing.”

The researchers measured blame by looking at more than 50 driver factors coded in the FARS database, including such “unambiguous” factors as driving through a red light or driving on the wrong side of the road.

Many of the study’s analyses take advantage of what the authors call “a natural experiment”: 2-vehicle collisions between a sober and a drinking driver. “Because the two drivers collide in exactly the same circumstances and at exactly the same time,” they write, “this natural experiment automatically standardizes many potentially confounding variables,” including weather and roadway conditions.

No safe level

The findings are unequivocal, Phillips said. “We find no safe combination of drinking and driving—no point at which it is harmless to consume alcohol and get behind the wheel of a car,” Phillips said. “Our data support both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s campaign that ‘Buzzed driving is drunk driving’ and the recommendation made by the National Transportation Safety Board, to reduce the legal limit to BAC 0.05 percent. In fact, our data provide support for yet greater reductions in the legal BAC.”

The current study follows up on a paper Phillips published in 2011 showing that buzzed driving is associated with greater accident severity.

Source: University of California San Diego, http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease/unsafe_at_any_level_very_low_blood_alcohol_content_associated_with_causing

The information provided on the Achieve Solutions site, including, but not limited to, articles, quizzes, and other general information, is for informational purposes only and should not be treated as medical, health care, psychiatric, psychological or behavioral health care advice. Nothing contained on the Achieve Solutions site is intended to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment or as a substitute for consultation with a qualified health care professional. Please direct questions regarding the operation of the Achieve Solutions site to Web Feedback. If you have concerns about your health, please contact your health care provider.  ©2017 Beacon Health Options, Inc.

 

Close

  • Useful Tools

    Select a tool below

© 2017 Beacon Health Options, Inc.